If NBA Finals were like the EURO 2012 Tournament

Group play. Tied games. Free throw shootouts? It could very well never happen, so that's why we blog it. Years ago (two to be exact) I started a similar venture with the World Cup, and never finished it. This will be almost the same, but I'll finish it this time (I won't be blogging regularly after this, it just seemed fitting to finish it now).

The Groups:

They're based off of how I've found them on ESPN.com, paired in 4's from left to right. Simple, no?

Group A, The Not Quite But Close Group of Death:

Chicago Bulls

Philadelphia 76ers

Miami Heat

NY Knicks

Group B, The One You Think You Know How It Will Finish:

Indiana Pacers

Orlando Magic

Boston Celtics

Atlanta Hawks

Group C, The Ironically Group C Is Always the Group of Death Isn't It:

San Antonio Spurs

Utah Jazz

OKC Thunder

Dallas Mavericks

Group D, The Anything Can Happen Group:

LA Lakers

Denver Nuggets

Memphis Grizzlies

LA Clippers

How I'll do this:

Each team will play each other in groups. Winners determined by actual playoffs result (ex. series winner) AND regular season results when available (total head to head record). If either is missing, the one not will prevail. If one team won playoffs but the other won regular season, I'll rule it a tie in group stages only (the intro was not a joke); afterwards I'll switch to a different method, but I'll explain when we get there.

The bracket will follow the same as EURO 2012. Top two advance to play top two of other groups (I’ll make a bracket when we get there, but you can just copy paste over the current EURO bracket if you really need one now). I'm also going to ignore all injuries that may or may not have happened for the sake of a good tournament.

So that's that. Let's get started.

Group Stage:

Group A:

Rose. James. Anthony. We sure it’s not the group of death here? Surprisingly, there’s a tougher group out there but we won’t focus on it yet. Games in this group we be tough, long, hard-fought, and not subject to “that’s what she said” jokes like this sentence. Poor jokes aside, let’s look at how they’d turn out:

Knicks v Heat: The tournament’s opening match would certainly not be a boring one, or one without stars. The classic Melo v LeBron arguments would start up in pre-match festivities, only to be squashed at halftime by the King himself.

RESULT: Heat win easily. (Heat postseason win)

76ers v Bulls: How do you follow up follow up a great first game? Make the second on just as good. Put the league’s best defending team against the league’s third best defending team. Everybody loves a defensive showdown, right? Well, everyone but fans that don’t like ties (basically most fans).                       

RESULT: Our first tie. (Bulls regular season, Philly postseason)

Heat v Bulls: Yet another showdown everyone wanted to see, and only in the group stages (or regular season, but who watches that…) can you get this! Unfortunately, unless you’re a fan of games that go back and forth all night with no results, you probably wouldn’t enjoy it. Just kidding, it’d be a great game!

RESULT: Another tie, but more exciting. (Tied regular season)

76ers v Knicks: Likely one of those games only fans of the sport (or the teams themselves) would watch. Doesn’t disappoint the fans that do watch it though! Well, doesn’t disappoint the Knicks fans. After a rough loss, the Knicks come back to beat a likely exhausted 76ers team.

RESULT: Knicks win. (Knicks regular season)

Heat v 76ers: Prolific scoring versus almost prolific defense. How does it end? With the almost best defense holding off the team I pretty much said had the best offense (but doesn’t). Much like the last game for the heat, it goes back and forth, but no team can get ahead of the other.                                                                    

RESULT: Tie. (Regular season tie)

Knicks v Bulls: The team that started off slow ends up surprising everyone by coming back to win their last game and make it to the Quarterfinals, all at the expense of the Knicks.                                                                                  

RESULT: Bulls win. (Bulls regular season)

Final Tally:

Unsurprisingly the Heat advance from this group, albeit stumbling through teams most would expect them to beat easily. The real surprise is Chicago advancing, as they didn’t make it through in the actual NBA Finals and on top of that, they tied on points. To choose the advancer, we’d normally go head to head. They tied, so I’ll do goal differential from their regular season games. Miami squeaks out by 1 more goal (point by NBA terms) scored.

Group A:

Team      Played      Pts     GD

Heat            3            5       15

Bulls           3            5       14

Knicks         3            4        --

76ers            3            2        --

(Bold advances)

Group B:

Mostly forgettable, yet at the same time it isn’t. After all, if one team who didn’t make it in the actual playoffs could make it to the quarterfinals, what’s to say a team from this group couldn’t win it all?

Magic v Pacers: A matchup of the giants of past, this game wouldn’t disappoint either set of fans. A back and forth match that one could only suspect ends with Dwight Howard making the game tying dunk whilst wearing a totally legal superman cape (after all, this isn’t David Stern’s NBA).

RESULT: Completely entertaining tie. (Orlando reg. season, Indiana postseason)

Celtics v Hawks: The three amigos play keep away from the Hawks all night in what proves to be the second blowout of the tournament. Not much else to type, really.

RESULT: Celtics win. (Celtics both regular and postseason)

Magic v Celtics: Superman cape or not, there’s nothing Dwight can do to stop the trio known as the Three Amigos. It is however, a tale of two halves. Orlando comes out fighting, only to be overwhelmed by the amigos in the second half.

RESULT: Celtics win. (Celtics regular season)

Pacers v Hawks: A close game the entire time, this is one that would be won in stoppage time (if the NBA used stoppage). The Pacers would start off leading, only to have the hawks swoop in right at the end for the kill (see what I did there?)

RESULT: Hawks win. (ATL regular season)

Celtics v Pacers: Close game after close game, a group that most (including myself) would likely write off still delivers. For the first time of the group stage, the Celtics are held off by a Pacers side that wasn’t having much luck in the tournament.

RESULT: Tie. (Regular season tied)

Hawks v Magic: The always solid Hawks perform the same as they would all group stage, coming together to create a well-deserved win. Dwight, his superman cape, and the rest of the Magic sulk their way back home.

RESULT: Hawks win. (Hawks regular season)

Final Tally:

Yet another group ends with a favorite advancing (the Celtics), an actual team not (the Pacers), an underdog advancing (the Hawks) and two leaders tied on points (more points this time, however). I swear I’m not purposefully making it like this. The Celtics however, win first due to head to head. Would rather goal differential instead? They’d win on that too.

Group B:

Team         Played       Pts

Celtics           3              7*

Hawks           3              7

Pacers           3              2

Magic            3              1

*Head to head over ATL

Group C:

The actual group of death. I’ll leave it at that.

Jazz v Spurs: In a bout of almost total domination, the Spurs show the Jazz (and fans) why it sucks to be that team mismatched to the group of death.

RESULT: Spurs win easily. (Spurs, regular and postseason)

OKC v Dallas: They say 1 man isn’t enough, but in soccer we say what if he’s German? (Note: Nobody in soccer ever says this. Ever.) Despite One German national on the Dallas team starting, it’s simply not enough. KD and friends bounce past the Mavs in this one.

RESULT: OKC wins. (Regular and postseason)

OKC v SPURS: The two giants face off in what would probably be another cliché-filled paragraph letting you know who wins. Just kidding. They tie.

RESULT: Tie. (Spurs regular season, OKC postseason).

Dallas v Jazz: Bouncing back from a tragic loss with a convincing win? That’s the power of German engineering from the post.

RESULT: Dallas win. (Regular season)

Jazz v OKC:  Utah’s last game to redeem themselves turns out to be a good one, at least by their standards. OKC takes the lead in the first half, only to give one up in the second. It’s not enough for Utah however, who goes home with zero points, the biggest victim of the group of death.

RESULT: OKC wins. (OKC regular season)

Dallas v Spurs: I love rivalries, and there’s fewer better than this one. The two neighbors battle through both halves, only to split the win for a tie. Dallas doesn’t advance by a single point.

RESULT: Painful tie. (Regular season split)

Final Tally:

In true group of death fashion, one advances happy, one goes home disappointed, and the two in the middle still hate each other. The surprising quality of this group? This is the only group to finish like the actual NBA Finals did.

Group C:

Team         Played       Pts

OKC              3              7

Spurs              3              5

Dallas             3              4

Jazz                3              0

Group D:

The Final Group of the Tournament, but definitely one not to forget: Two crosstown rivals thrown in with two teams having much recent success? Sounds like a recipe for chaos in the tournament, and that might just be what we get.

Lakers v Denver: A (insert overused cliché positive term here) Denver team goes in ready to beat the world only to exit the game beaten by the world. The world in the case of course, being the Lakers.

RESULT: Lakers Win. (Regular and postseason)

Clippers v Memphis: They say bears have a keen sense of smell, even keen enough to be able to detect women. Unfortunately for Memphis however, this wasn’t a WNBA game. The clippers give the grizzlies the haircut of their lives, and a loss.

RESULT: Clippers win. (Regular and postseason)

Denver v Memphis: Proving every case of “Samson syndrome” wrong, the grizzlies pull off an easy win versus the team still looking for gold in a postseason mine of disappointment.

RESULT: Grizzlies win. (Regular season)

LAL v LAC:  The crosstown showdown. Superteam of old vs Superteam of new. Old dogs however, don’t need to learn new tricks in this battle and end up showing the newcomers how it’s been done in LA all along.

RESULT: LAL wins. (Regular season)

Memphis v Lakers: The all too dominant Lakers cruise past Memphis after a brief scare or two in the first half. By the end of the game it’s clear who was going to win all along.

RESULT: Lakers win. (Regular season)

Clippers v Denver: The Clippers come back to show why no one should mess with them, while Denver joins Orlando in the post-game sulking.

RESULT: Clippers win. (Regular season)

Final Tally:

This group was all about the numbers: For the first time, a group winner finishes with all 9 points possible. For the second time, a team goes home without points. Once more, teams end up like they did in the actual playoffs. This stuff could be exciting if they actually did it like this could it not?

Group D:

Team         Played       Pts

Lakers           3              9

Clippers         3              7

Grizzlies        3              3

Denver           3              0

Knockout Stage:

Quarterfinals:

Advancing to the quarterfinals are the Heat, Bulls, Celtics, Hawks, OKC, Spurs, Lakers, and Clippers. The eight teams will be paired as such:

Winner A v Runner up B

Winner B v Runner up A

Winner C v Runner up D

Winner D v Runner up C

Or

QF1 Heat v Hawks

QF2 Celtics v Bulls

QF3 OKC v Clippers

QF4 Lakers v Spurs

After this, they’ll go into semifinals. That will look like this:

Winner QF1 v Winner QF3

Winner QF2 v Winner QF4

And then of course it’s the final.

Now, I mentioned earlier that I’d go into something different to settle ties when we got out of group stages, and I wasn’t lying. To make things more controversial (as if they weren’t enough already), I’ll use free throw shootouts. The team with the higher free throw percentage will advance, and the other goes home. That said, at the time of writing this I don’t even know that we’ll get this far.

The Quarterfinal Games:

Heat v Hawks: Eager to upset the team to beat, the Hawks strike first. Dream team 2.0 doesn’t take it well, returning the favor and then some. The Heat make the Hawks look like England during penalties and walk away with a solid win.

RESULT: Heat wins. (Regular season)

Celtics v Bulls: While the Celtics played better in the group stages than the Bulls, that didn’t stop the Bulls from making it a game. The Bulls come out guns blazing and keep it going until the whistle blows.

RESULT: Bulls win. (Regular season)

OKC v Clippers: In what would be the game of the Quarterfinals, Griffin and co. bring their A-game to upset the same team that would go on to lose the actual NBA Finals (Cue fans of OKC: “But they made it didn’t they? Isn’t that enough?”)

RESULT: Clippers win. (Regular season)

Lakers v Spurs: I know what you’re thinking: “been there, done that in like a buhmillion NBA Finals…” You’re probably… right, but instead of the Lakers advancing per recent times, it’s the Spurs that make it through.

RESULT: Spurs win. (Regular season)

Semifinals:
Going with the aforementioned bracket, they end up being two very good match-ups and looking like this:
Heat v Spurs
Bulls v Clippers

Heat v Spurs: There is no crueler mistress than the sea. Except of course, for the NBA Finals (sailors, we can debate the factuality of this statement later).In this particular case, the Mistress belongs to the Spurs. The Heat and Spurs only played one game this season, and the Heat won it. They’d win this game too.

Finalist Numero Uno: The Heat

Bulls v Clippers: Let’s be honest. With either team here advancing, it ends up being a match everyone would have wanted to see at the beginning of the season. All that aside, another cruel mistress was present for this semifinal, unfortunately at the expense of the Clippers. Another one game result sends a team to the exciting conclusion.

Finalist Numero Dos: The Bulls

THE FINAL

In a game surely not officiated by that one old ref whose name I forget and who hates Tim Duncan and the Spurs, it actually looks like it’d be a cool match. One team that actually made it, and one that didn’t. Of course in this, I’m ignoring all injuries, so anything was always possible. Anyway, to the match itself:

Heat v Bulls

If you remember the group stages, you’ll know they end up tied the first time around. If you know my style, you’ll know they end up tied the second time around. I mean why else would I have come up with the whole free-throw shootout thing? So, if NBA games were EURO 2012 PK shootouts, this would be England v Italy. England, of course being the Bulls, and Italy the Heat. That’s right. The Heat still win, even in a playoff format like this.

The End

So that’s that. I hope you enjoyed it, and if you didn’t, let me know why as I'm always open to criticism (unless it has to do with the Groups C+D puns or fragments. This entire blog is built on fragments and puns.)

Five Reasons Why FIFA will ultimately prevent soccer from being "The world's game" in America + WC Complaints!

The World Cup groups stages are over, and 4 round of 16 games have already been played... however, these matches were not without controversy. So without further ado, here are my complaints about the world cup, and reasons FIFA will prevent soccer from being "the world's game" in America. 


Reason number one:

Soccer vs. Football

Will the name argument ever end? No, and this is one very obvious reason soccer will never truly be a huge sport in America. It's obvious we have the NFL and because of that, soccer may will not ever be referred to as football, despite the scientific fact that feet are used more in soccer. The fact that America will not refer to Soccer as "Football" is not a big deal, though and I think most Americans realize that. The rest of the world however, (minus Australia, of course) needs to realize that America cannot (and will not) refer to soccer as Football. Once the petty arguments about the "real" name of the game stop, soccer can move on it's way towards being a more popular sport in America.

Complaint number one:

Sepp Blatter

Look at him. He's practically the penguin. (photo by AP)

Complaints? Sepp Blatter? Too many to blog about, but here's the gist of it: He's against the introduction of goal line technology, despite the fact that EVERY other major sport in the history of sports has at least one form of replay. He personally made sure the vuvuzela stayed at the world cup. And finally, he has no problems with cheaters in the world cup (see France v Ireland).

Complaint number two:

Terrible decisions by refereeing crews*

Look, I hate blaming referees as much as the next guy. Mainly because I referee soccer games quite a bit. You have to be in top shape to even think about being able to keep up with the flow of the game, not to mention have your eyes on the players, entire field, and AR's. It's probably the hardest game to referee, but all that aside, there were several calls that were just plain terrible.

Phantom Foul? Offside? We may ever know.

 

Handball? Even the "Hand of god" criticized it, but only because everyone laughed afterward.

FIFA Law 15-2010-USA states "if the USA have a chance of looking decent, the referee may disallow a goal if needed"

 

Even the German keeper, doing his best mid-air dolphin impression knew it was a goal.

You don't need to be German to understand this terrible call, or lack thereof.

You know it's bad when I argue that Lampard's goal for England vs. Germany should have counted (revenge of 66?) and that a goal against Mexico shouldn't have counted. Like Sepp Blatter, the referees could have more than enough complaints to fill up a blog post, however I'll just stick with these five as they are some of the most obvious.

Reason Number Two:

Koman Coulibaly

The world's utmost authority on half awake refereeing, Coulibaly put Mali on the map, but not the good map. (Photo © international hazma)

It's never a good idea to take anything that will make you drowsy before a match, but that didn't stop Coulibaly. Now, one may argue we didn't need the goal to advance... To which I would reply, "One does not need eyes to read, so give Koman yours. He NEEDS them." This guy was probably the worst and most influential referee so far this tournament, despite the number of referees who wrongly sent off players in other matches. But don't expect his mistake to keep Koman out of future world cups, much less the Cup of African Nations. Sepp Blatter likes this guy too much, no matter how many mistakes he makes. Referees like Koman are a huge reason people just starting to watch soccer will turn away. Bad calls in big name sports don't turn most fans away, but with soccer, a not-so-popular sport in the U.S., calls like this could ruin the game's reputation for life.

Reason/Complaint number three:

The Vuvuzela

Hey look, it's a vuvuzela party! (no homo?)

Vuvuzelas: Traditional African instrument. Weapon. AnnoyiBRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR...

And that's it... Only five total complaints and reasons? Yes, but only because I'm sticking with the major ones. Any I forgot? Just add them in the comments. Oh, and the actual number of complaints/reasons I put in this blog is unknown to me. I'm too lazy to count. Sorry.

A Few Changes, or The First blog of the year.

Well, it's pretty much been a year with no blogs. I apologize. I really do like blogging short stories/Fake news/A serious blog every now and then, but there's just one problem. I can't just do that. So, to keep my attention and yours, I'm making a few changes. Here they are:

• I'll be adding pictures and logos I design on the computer. You'll probably like them. If not, they're still probably going on this blog.
• Less short stories/Fake news, but no more serious blogs. The internet is not my favorite place to debate, much less on a blog like this.. I might start a serious blog at a later time for stuff like that.
• I'll try and do more "Tales from the Oven" but no promises. (I have two "tales" potentially in the works.)
• Music reviews? Maybe. If anyone responds.
• And Finally, FIFA World Cup 2010 Complaints. I'm going to have them, so why not blog them so you can agree with me?*

If you have any ideas, let me know and I'll think about it.


*I might have no complaints. Keyword might. The USMNT has to win it for that to happen.

Merry Soon-to-be Christmas

Merry Christmas, and a happy new year.




That's all I'll blog about for now, which is more than I have in probably a year. Hooray!

Seeing as I never blog anymore,

I'm thinking I'm just going to get rid of my blog. I just don't write as much as I used to.

Grammar VS.The Internet: The war that will last forever.

Grammar Versus the Internet
or
The Neverending War, Pt. I


Epilogue

Few things last forever, and everyone knows that. But the lack of grammar on the internet, if left uncorrected, could last forever. One simply has to look on "Facebook", "Myspace", or the ultimate offender, a website that throws grammar out the window like William Shatner once threw caution to the wind, "I can has cheezburger". Five minutes on any of the following sites reveals one obvious thing; Grammar has no home on the internet. In this Weblog of mine, I will strategically break down my talking points into three small sections. Read with caution, as one may be offended when I go though the errors of many made on the internet.

Mine is Mine; Yours is yours, and you're is not what your thinking causes you believe it is.

The most popular mistake one can make is believing that the word 'your' is the same as "you're", the contraction for you are. It is not the same. If one would simply remember what they learned in school over a period of about 10+ years, they would avoid this mistake. The word 'your' is possessive, and should only be used in sentences dealing with possession, not actions. The word you're is quite underused, as the word your often replaces it. How would one feel if they were replaced by something that didn't do the same job? Rejected, of course. So the next time one writes a sentence, think. The word "you're", not "your" should be used to simplify "you are". To recap, it's simple:

• Your ≠ You're.
• See above.

They're having fun over there with their new favorite contraction, "they're".

Pretty much the same as above. They're ≠ there ≠ their. The word "they're" is used to denote a group of something doing something, the word "there" is meant to denote a location, and finally the word "their" is used in possessive sentences. In review:

• They're ≠ there ≠ their.
• You probably thought I'd say "See Above"
• You're right in thinking that, See Above.

Spelling Errors Come Easily, but Firefox with Spell Check is Easier.

It's as simple as these three steps:

1. Download Firefox here, then install it.
2. See above. It's that simple, and Firefox has a built in Spell Checker.

En Revisar.

Using Spanish in any sentence can confuse the average person, and one can always have fun with that. Fun aside, I'm entirely kidding about this whole blog. This is just what happens when I'm bored. But seriously people, take my advice. At least, the simplified advice(anything that had the phrase "See above" with it).

The End.

John McCain Picks Cardinals to Win Super Bowl; Dems Claim Victory After Game "Just For Fun"

TAMPA BAY, FL- In what some are calling one of the lamest possible things the Democrats can do to rub John McCain's loss in his face, the Democrats claimed Victory yet again Sunday night- Because McCain picked the Cards to win. President Obama held a press conference that night to congratulate the Steelers for "sort of doing the same thing I did". Joe Biden, though uninvited, also made an appearance only to say that he "wanted the Cards to win too, because he thought Kurt Warner reminded him of himself and the team reminded him of Barack..." when asked what he meant, he went on to say "Joe Biden is like Kurt Warner... I'm leading an inexperienced team in the big game... er sorry folks, my mouth is like a train: it starts going, and can't be stopped".
Joe later left the conference, only to find Barack didn't like a word he said. Other Democrats were asked what they thought as well, with Hilary Clinton saying "it was a great game..." and "I should probably get some terrible towels too for when I'm president". Her husband Bill thought it was a good game as well, and that the cheerleaders did a great job cheering the team on. It was also reported he later called both franchises to find out how to get them for Hilary's next campaign, because "She always needs people to cheer her on". My sources thought for a minute or so about whether or not to ask Nancy Pelosi for her opinion of the game, but they quickly realized she would just take the opportunity to talk about pass "protection", rather than the actual game.

In other news, former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich went legally insane after cops wouldn't arrest him for "illegally trying to sell Super Bowl XLIII seats for the right price". Turns out, he finally did something that is worthy of the words "legally" and "selling" in the same sentence.